NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 Pro vs Approach S72 43mm

Coros Pace 4 Pro vs Garmin Approach S72 43mm

What Pace 4 Pro does better (4) and where Approach S72 43mm wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4 Pro
Coros · 2026Pace 4 Pro
8.2Score
4 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S72 43mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 43mm
6.3Score
3 advantages≈ $800
8.4Display5.0
4.9Health tracking8.3
4.2Sports & outdoor6.7
6.5Smart features3.2
5.0Build & durability5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4 ProApproach S72 43mm
47.6 × 47.611.843 × 4312.9
Pace 4 ProApproach S72 43mmDifference
Height47.6 mm43 mm+4.6 mm
Width47.6 mm43 mm+4.6 mm
Thickness11.8 mm12.9 mm−1.1 mm
Weight51 g41 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 Pro better than Approach S72 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)21 days vs 10 days2.1×
  2. Screen size1.47″ vs 1.3″+13%
  3. Resolution (width)466 px vs 416 px+12%
  4. Thickness11.8 mm vs 12.9 mm+10%

Why is Approach S72 43mm better than Pace 4 Pro?

  1. Sport profiles31 vs 953.1×
  2. Weight51 g vs 41 g+24%
  3. Storage32 GB vs 64 GB2×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare