NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 Pro vs Approach S72 47mm

Coros Pace 4 Pro vs Garmin Approach S72 47mm

What Pace 4 Pro does better (4) and where Approach S72 47mm wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4 Pro
Coros · 2026Pace 4 Pro
8.2Score
4 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Garmin Approach S72 47mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 47mm
6.5Score
4 advantages≈ $800
8.4Display6.5
4.9Health tracking8.3
4.2Sports & outdoor6.7
6.5Smart features3.2
5.0Build & durability5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4 ProApproach S72 47mm
47.6 × 47.611.847 × 4713.5
Pace 4 ProApproach S72 47mmDifference
Height47.6 mm47 mm+0.6 mm
Width47.6 mm47 mm+0.6 mm
Thickness11.8 mm13.5 mm−1.7 mm
Weight51 g48 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 Pro better than Approach S72 47mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)21 days vs 16 days+31%
  2. Screen size1.47″ vs 1.4″+5%
  3. Thickness11.8 mm vs 13.5 mm+14%
  4. Resolution (width)466 px vs 454 px+3%

Why is Approach S72 47mm better than Pace 4 Pro?

  1. Sport profiles31 vs 953.1×
  2. Storage32 GB vs 64 GB2×
  3. Weight51 g vs 48 g+6%
  4. Pixel density317 ppi vs 324 ppi+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare