NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 Pro vs Run 2

Coros Pace 4 Pro vs Suunto Run 2

What Pace 4 Pro does better (6) and where Run 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4 Pro
Coros · 2026Pace 4 Pro
8.2Score
6 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Suunto Run 2
Suunto · 2026Run 2
5.4Score
2 advantages≈ $320
8.4Display7.1
8.3Battery life4.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
4.2Sports & outdoor4.5
5.0Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4 ProRun 2
47.6 × 47.611.846.5 × 46.511.7
Pace 4 ProRun 2Difference
Height47.6 mm46.5 mm+1.1 mm
Width47.6 mm46.5 mm+1.1 mm
Thickness11.8 mm11.7 mm+0.1 mm
Weight51 g53 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 Pro better than Run 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)21 days vs 12 days+75%
  2. GPS battery life60 h vs 30 h2×
  3. Wi-FiWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 14×
  4. Screen size1.47″ vs 1.32″+11%
  5. Weight51 g vs 53 g+4%
  6. GPS battery life (dual-band)40 h vs 24 h+67%

Why is Run 2 better than Pace 4 Pro?

  1. Pixel density317 ppi vs 353 ppi+11%
  2. Sport profiles31 vs 32+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare