NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 Pro vs Vertical

Coros Pace 4 Pro vs Suunto Vertical

What Pace 4 Pro does better (6) and where Vertical wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4 Pro
Coros · 2026Pace 4 Pro
8.2Score
6 advantages≈ $450
vs
Suunto Vertical
Suunto · 2023Vertical
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
8.4Display4.4
8.3Battery life9.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
4.2Sports & outdoor6.4
5.0Build & durability7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4 ProVertical
47.6 × 47.611.849 × 4913.6
Pace 4 ProVerticalDifference
Height47.6 mm49 mm−1.4 mm
Width47.6 mm49 mm−1.4 mm
Thickness11.8 mm13.6 mm−1.8 mm
Weight51 g86 g−35 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 Pro better than Vertical?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertical: No
  2. Weight51 g vs 86 g+69%
  3. Screen size1.47″ vs 1.4″+5%
  4. Resolution (width)466 px vs 280 px+66%
  5. Pixel density317 ppi vs 200 ppi+58%
  6. Thickness11.8 mm vs 13.6 mm+15%

Why is Vertical better than Pace 4 Pro?

  1. GPS battery life60 h vs 90 h+50%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Sport profiles31 vs 953.1×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)40 h vs 65 h+62%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare