NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 vs Race S

Coros Pace 4 vs Suunto Race S

What Pace 4 does better (5) and where Race S wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4
Coros · 2025Pace 4
6.1Score
5 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race S
Suunto · 2024Race S
6.1Score
8 advantages≈ $300
5.3Display4.8
7.1Battery life4.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor6.4
3.4Build & durability9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4Race S
43.4 × 43.411.845 × 4511.4
Pace 4Race SDifference
Height43.4 mm45 mm−1.6 mm
Width43.4 mm45 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness11.8 mm11.4 mm+0.4 mm
Weight40 g53 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 better than Race S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)19 days vs 9 days2.1×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race S: No
  3. GPS battery life41 h vs 40 h+2%
  4. Weight40 g vs 53 g+32%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 30 h+3%

Why is Race S better than Pace 4?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Sport profiles28 vs 953.4×
  3. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  4. Sapphire crystalNo · Pace 4: Yes
  5. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  7. Pixel density325 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
  8. Thickness11.8 mm vs 11.4 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare