NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Vertix 2S vs Fenix 8 47mm AMOLED

Coros Vertix 2S vs Garmin Fenix 8 47mm AMOLED

What Vertix 2S does better (3) and where Fenix 8 47mm AMOLED wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Coros Vertix 2S
Coros · 2024Vertix 2S
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $700
Higher score
vs
Garmin Fenix 8 47mm AMOLED
Garmin · 2024Fenix 8 47mm AMOLED
8.0Score
6 advantages≈ $1,000
4.4Display7.5
9.8Battery life6.9
4.9Health tracking8.3
5.2Sports & outdoor8.2
7.8Build & durability7.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Vertix 2SFenix 8 47mm AMOLED
50.3 × 50.31647 × 4713.8
Vertix 2SFenix 8 47mm AMOLEDDifference
Height50.3 mm47 mm+3.3 mm
Width50.3 mm47 mm+3.3 mm
Thickness16 mm13.8 mm+2.2 mm
Weight87 g80 g+7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Vertix 2S better than Fenix 8 47mm AMOLED?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)36 days vs 16 days2.2×
  2. GPS battery life118 h vs 47 h2.5×
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)43 h vs 35 h+23%

Why is Fenix 8 47mm AMOLED better than Vertix 2S?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Vertix 2S: Yes
  2. Sport profiles43 vs 992.3×
  3. Weight87 g vs 80 g+9%
  4. Resolution (width)280 px vs 454 px+62%
  5. Pixel density200 ppi vs 324 ppi+62%
  6. Thickness16 mm vs 13.8 mm+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare