NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C20 Pro vs BT101

Cubot C20 Pro vs Oukitel BT101

What C20 Pro does better (1) and where BT101 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C20 Pro
Cubot · 2023C20 Pro
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $55
vs
Oukitel BT101
Oukitel · 2024BT101
4.6Score
5 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
3.7Display4.2
5.0Health tracking5.0
2.5Smart features3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

C20 ProBT101
43 × 5412.946.1 × 58.313.3
C20 ProBT101Difference
Height54 mm58.3 mm−4.3 mm
Width43 mm46.1 mm−3.1 mm
Thickness12.9 mm13.3 mm−0.4 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C20 Pro better than BT101?

  1. Thickness12.9 mm vs 13.3 mm+3%

Why is BT101 better than C20 Pro?

  1. SpeakerNo · C20 Pro: Yes
  2. Screen size1.81″ vs 2.02″+12%
  3. Resolution (width)240 px vs 320 px+33%
  4. Pixel density206 ppi vs 250 ppi+21%
  5. Battery capacity380 mAh vs 410 mAh+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare