vs
3.7Display2.0
5.0Health tracking5.0
2.5Smart features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
C20 ProTechLife Watch R100
| C20 Pro | TechLife Watch R100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 54 mm | 54.1 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 46 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 12.2 mm | +0.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C20 Pro better than TechLife Watch R100?
- Screen size1.81″ vs 1.32″+37%
Why is TechLife Watch R100 better than C20 Pro?
- SpeakerNo · C20 Pro: Yes
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 360 px+50%
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 278 ppi+35%
- Thickness12.9 mm vs 12.2 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 54 mm | 54 mm |
| Weight | — | 46 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 12.2 mm |
| Height | 54 mm | 54.1 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 46 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Gray, Orange | Black, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.81″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 360 px |
| Resolution (height) | 286 px | 360 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 278 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 380 mAh | 380 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
