NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C28 vs C29

Cubot C28 vs Cubot C29

What C28 does better (1) and where C29 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C28
Cubot · 2024C28
4.3Score
1 advantage
vs
Cubot C29
Cubot · 2024C29
4.4Score
3 advantages
Higher score
4.2Display4.3
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features3.9
2.2Build & durability2.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

C28C29
46.1 × 58.313.349.5 × 51.913.4
C28C29Difference
Height58.3 mm51.9 mm+6.4 mm
Width46.1 mm49.5 mm−3.4 mm
Thickness13.3 mm13.4 mm−0.1 mm
Weight44 g42 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C28 better than C29?

  1. Screen size2.02″ vs 1.52″+33%

Why is C29 better than C28?

  1. Weight44.5 g vs 42.1 g+6%
  2. Pixel density250 ppi vs 335 ppi+34%
  3. Resolution (width)320 px vs 360 px+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare