NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C28 vs iQOO Watch GT

Cubot C28 vs Vivo iQOO Watch GT

What C28 does better (1) and where iQOO Watch GT wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C28
Cubot · 2024C28
4.3Score
1 advantage
vs
Vivo iQOO Watch GT
Vivo · 2024iQOO Watch GT
6.7Score
11 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
4.2Display8.7
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features9.6
2.2Build & durability2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

C28iQOO Watch GT
46.1 × 58.313.339.6 × 45.811.2
C28iQOO Watch GTDifference
Height58.3 mm45.8 mm+12.5 mm
Width46.1 mm39.6 mm+6.5 mm
Thickness13.3 mm11.2 mm+2.1 mm
Weight44 g33 g+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C28 better than iQOO Watch GT?

  1. Screen size2.02″ vs 1.85″+9%

Why is iQOO Watch GT better than C28?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · C28: Yes
  2. Water resistance1 ATM vs 2 ATM2×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · C28: Yes
  4. NFC paymentsNo · C28: Yes
  5. LTE (cellular)No · C28: Yes
  6. Weight44.5 g vs 33 g+35%
  7. eSIMNo · C28: Yes
  8. Pixel density250 ppi vs 322 ppi+29%
  9. Battery capacity410 mAh vs 505 mAh+23%
  10. Resolution (width)320 px vs 390 px+22%
  11. Thickness13.3 mm vs 11.2 mm+19%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare