4.3Display3.5
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
C29Watch 6010
| C29 | Watch 6010 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 51.9 mm | 255 mm | −203.1 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 37 mm | +12.5 mm |
| Thickness | 13.4 mm | 10 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Weight | 42 g | 35 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C29 better than Watch 6010?
C29 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch 6010 better than C29?
- Built-in GPSNo · C29: Yes
- Weight42.1 g vs 35 g+20%
- Screen size1.52″ vs 1.65″+9%
- Thickness13.4 mm vs 10 mm+34%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 52 mm | — |
| Weight | 42.1 g | 35 g |
| Thickness | 13.4 mm | 10 mm |
| Height | 51.9 mm | 255 mm |
| Width | 49.5 mm | 37 mm |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | — | Kunststoff |
| Water resistance | 1 ATM | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.52″ | 1.65″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 360 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 360 px | — |
| Pixel density | 335 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 410 mAh | — |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | — |
| LTE (cellular) | No | — |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
