NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C5 vs Vivoactive 4S

Cubot C5 vs Garmin Vivoactive 4S

What C5 does better (4) and where Vivoactive 4S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C5
Cubot · 2020C5
4.4Score
4 advantages
vs
Garmin Vivoactive 4S
Garmin · 2019Vivoactive 4S
5.6Score
2 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
2.5Smart features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

C5Vivoactive 4S
43 × 431040 × 4012.7
C5Vivoactive 4SDifference
Height43 mm40 mm+3 mm
Width43 mm40 mm+3 mm
Thickness10 mm12.7 mm−2.7 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C5 better than Vivoactive 4S?

  1. Screen size1.7″ vs 1.1″+55%
  2. Thickness10 mm vs 12.7 mm+27%
  3. Resolution (width)240 px vs 218 px+10%
  4. Pixel density217 ppi vs 198 ppi+10%

Why is Vivoactive 4S better than C5?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · C5: Yes
  2. NFC paymentsNo · C5: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare