Dimensions
Size comparison
C5Watch ES
| C5 | Watch ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43 mm | 46 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 30 mm | +13 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 12.3 mm | −2.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C5 better than Watch ES?
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.64″+4%
- Battery capacity260 mAh vs 180 mAh+44%
- Thickness10 mm vs 12.3 mm+23%
Why is Watch ES better than C5?
- Built-in GPSNo · C5: Yes
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · C5: Yes
- Pixel density217 ppi vs 326 ppi+50%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 280 px+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 43 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 21 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 12.3 mm |
| Height | 43 mm | 46 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 30 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Scratch-resistant glass | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Pink | Meteorite Black, Coral Pink, Icelandic White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.64″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 280 px | 456 px |
| Pixel density | 217 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 260 mAh | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Storage | — | 4 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
