Dimensions
Size comparison
C5Watch GPS
| C5 | Watch GPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43 mm | 42 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 37 mm | +6 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 12 mm | −2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C5 better than Watch GPS?
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.3″+31%
- Battery capacity260 mAh vs 210 mAh+24%
- Thickness10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Why is Watch GPS better than C5?
- Built-in GPSNo · C5: Yes
- Pixel density217 ppi vs 261 ppi+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 43 mm | 42 mm |
| Weight | — | 35 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 12 mm |
| Height | 43 mm | 42 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 37 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Scratch-resistant glass | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Pink | Black/Green, Black/Red, Pink/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 280 px | 240 px |
| Pixel density | 217 ppi | 261 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 260 mAh | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
