vs
2.1Display4.0
2.5Smart features2.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
C9Moto Watch 100
| C9 | Moto Watch 100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43 mm | 42 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 46 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 11.9 mm | −1.9 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C9 better than Moto Watch 100?
- Thickness10 mm vs 11.9 mm+19%
Why is Moto Watch 100 better than C9?
- Built-in GPSNo · C9: Yes
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 355 mAh+69%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 360 px+50%
- Pixel density265 ppi vs 392 ppi+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 43 mm | 42 mm |
| Weight | — | 29 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 11.9 mm |
| Height | 43 mm | 42 mm |
| Width | 43 mm | 46 mm |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | Scratch-resistant glass | — |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Pink | Glacier Silver, Phantom Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.28″ | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 360 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 360 px |
| Pixel density | 265 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 355 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary OS | Moto Watch OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
