NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C9 vs Ignite 2

Cubot C9 vs Polar Ignite 2

What C9 does better (3) and where Ignite 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C9
Cubot · 2021C9
3.5Score
3 advantages
vs
Polar Ignite 2
Polar · 2021Ignite 2
3.7Score
2 advantages≈ $260
Higher score
2.1Display2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

C9Ignite 2
43 × 431043 × 438.5
C9Ignite 2Difference
Height43 mm43 mm=
Width43 mm43 mm=
Thickness10 mm8.5 mm+1.5 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C9 better than Ignite 2?

  1. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.2″+7%
  2. Pixel density265 ppi vs 200 ppi+32%
  3. Battery capacity210 mAh vs 165 mAh+27%

Why is Ignite 2 better than C9?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · C9: Yes
  2. Thickness10 mm vs 8.5 mm+18%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare