NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. C9 vs Galaxy Watch4 Classic

Cubot C9 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch4 Classic

What C9 does better (1) and where Galaxy Watch4 Classic wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Cubot C9
Cubot · 2021C9
3.5Score
1 advantage
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch4 Classic
Samsung · 2021Galaxy Watch4 Classic
6.2Score
10 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
2.1Display5.3
2.5Smart features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

C9Galaxy Watch4 Classic
43 × 431045.5 × 45.511
C9Galaxy Watch4 ClassicDifference
Height43 mm45.5 mm−2.5 mm
Width43 mm45.5 mm−2.5 mm
Thickness10 mm11 mm−1 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is C9 better than Galaxy Watch4 Classic?

  1. Thickness10 mm vs 11 mm+10%

Why is Galaxy Watch4 Classic better than C9?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · C9: Yes
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · C9: Yes
  3. NFC paymentsNo · C9: Yes
  4. LTE (cellular)No · C9: Yes
  5. eSIMNo · C9: Yes
  6. SpeakerNo · C9: Yes
  7. Resolution (width)240 px vs 450 px+88%
  8. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.4″+9%
  9. Battery capacity210 mAh vs 361 mAh+72%
  10. Pixel density265 ppi vs 321 ppi+21%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare