NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. ID206 vs Vivoactive 4

Cubot ID206 vs Garmin Vivoactive 4

What ID206 does better (3) and where Vivoactive 4 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cubot ID206
Cubot · 2020ID206
4.7Score
3 advantages
vs
Garmin Vivoactive 4
Garmin · 2019Vivoactive 4
6.0Score
3 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
5.0Health tracking5.0
2.5Smart features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

ID206Vivoactive 4
40 × 401245.1 × 45.112.8
ID206Vivoactive 4Difference
Height40 mm45.1 mm−5.1 mm
Width40 mm45.1 mm−5.1 mm
Thickness12 mm12.8 mm−0.8 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ID206 better than Vivoactive 4?

  1. Screen size1.7″ vs 1.3″+31%
  2. Pixel density217 ppi vs 200 ppi+8%
  3. Thickness12 mm vs 12.8 mm+7%

Why is Vivoactive 4 better than ID206?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · ID206: Yes
  2. NFC paymentsNo · ID206: Yes
  3. Resolution (width)240 px vs 260 px+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare