NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. ID206 vs Vivoactive 4S

Cubot ID206 vs Garmin Vivoactive 4S

What ID206 does better (4) and where Vivoactive 4S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot ID206
Cubot · 2020ID206
4.7Score
4 advantages
vs
Garmin Vivoactive 4S
Garmin · 2019Vivoactive 4S
5.6Score
2 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
5.0Health tracking5.0
2.5Smart features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

ID206Vivoactive 4S
40 × 401240 × 4012.7
ID206Vivoactive 4SDifference
Height40 mm40 mm=
Width40 mm40 mm=
Thickness12 mm12.7 mm−0.7 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ID206 better than Vivoactive 4S?

  1. Screen size1.7″ vs 1.1″+55%
  2. Resolution (width)240 px vs 218 px+10%
  3. Pixel density217 ppi vs 198 ppi+10%
  4. Thickness12 mm vs 12.7 mm+6%

Why is Vivoactive 4S better than ID206?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · ID206: Yes
  2. NFC paymentsNo · ID206: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare