NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. ID206 vs Vivomove 3S

Cubot ID206 vs Garmin Vivomove 3S

What ID206 does better (3) and where Vivomove 3S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot ID206
Cubot · 2020ID206
4.7Score
3 advantages
vs
Garmin Vivomove 3S
Garmin · 2019Vivomove 3S
5.6Score
2 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
3.1Display4.4
5.0Health tracking5.0
5.3Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

ID206Vivomove 3S
40 × 401239 × 3910.9
ID206Vivomove 3SDifference
Height40 mm39 mm+1 mm
Width40 mm39 mm+1 mm
Thickness12 mm10.9 mm+1.1 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ID206 better than Vivomove 3S?

  1. Screen size1.7″ vs 0.8″2.1×
  2. Resolution (width)240 px vs 64 px3.8×
  3. Pixel density217 ppi vs 183 ppi+19%

Why is Vivomove 3S better than ID206?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · ID206: Yes
  2. Thickness12 mm vs 10.9 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare