NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. ID206 vs Galaxy Watch3

Cubot ID206 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch3

What ID206 does better (1) and where Galaxy Watch3 wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Cubot ID206
Cubot · 2020ID206
4.7Score
1 advantage
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch3
Samsung · 2020Galaxy Watch3
7.7Score
10 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
3.1Display7.3
5.0Health tracking9.2
2.5Smart features7.9
5.3Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

ID206Galaxy Watch3
40 × 401245 × 46.211.1
ID206Galaxy Watch3Difference
Height40 mm46.2 mm−6.2 mm
Width40 mm45 mm−5 mm
Thickness12 mm11.1 mm+0.9 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ID206 better than Galaxy Watch3?

  1. Screen size1.7″ vs 1.4″+21%

Why is Galaxy Watch3 better than ID206?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · ID206: Yes
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · ID206: Yes
  3. NFC paymentsNo · ID206: Yes
  4. LTE (cellular)No · ID206: Yes
  5. eSIMNo · ID206: Yes
  6. SpeakerNo · ID206: Yes
  7. Pixel density217 ppi vs 364 ppi+68%
  8. Resolution (width)240 px vs 360 px+50%
  9. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 340 mAh+13%
  10. Thickness12 mm vs 11.1 mm+8%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare