NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. U1 vs CMF Watch 3 Pro

Cubot U1 vs Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro

What U1 does better (3) and where CMF Watch 3 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Cubot U1
Cubot · 2025U1
4.2Score
3 advantages
vs
Nothing CMF Watch 3 Pro
Nothing · 2025CMF Watch 3 Pro
6.0Score
5 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
3.9Display5.0
5.0Health tracking5.0
3.9Smart features4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

U1CMF Watch 3 Pro
42.4 × 49.811.447 × 4714.4
U1CMF Watch 3 ProDifference
Height49.8 mm47 mm+2.8 mm
Width42.4 mm47 mm−4.6 mm
Thickness11.4 mm14.4 mm−3 mm
Weight44 g51 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is U1 better than CMF Watch 3 Pro?

  1. Screen size1.93″ vs 1.43″+35%
  2. Weight43.8 g vs 51 g+16%
  3. Thickness11.4 mm vs 14.4 mm+26%

Why is CMF Watch 3 Pro better than U1?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · U1: Yes
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · U1: Yes
  3. Resolution (width)240 px vs 466 px+94%
  4. Pixel density194 ppi vs 326 ppi+68%
  5. Battery capacity300 mAh vs 350 mAh+17%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare