NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. W03 vs Galaxy Watch4 Classic

Cubot W03 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch4 Classic

What W03 does better (1) and where Galaxy Watch4 Classic wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Cubot W03
Cubot · 2021W03
3.6Score
1 advantage
vs
Samsung Galaxy Watch4 Classic
Samsung · 2021Galaxy Watch4 Classic
6.2Score
10 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
2.7Display5.3
2.5Smart features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

W03Galaxy Watch4 Classic
43 × 431245.5 × 45.511
W03Galaxy Watch4 ClassicDifference
Height43 mm45.5 mm−2.5 mm
Width43 mm45.5 mm−2.5 mm
Thickness12 mm11 mm+1 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is W03 better than Galaxy Watch4 Classic?

  1. Screen size1.7″ vs 1.4″+21%

Why is Galaxy Watch4 Classic better than W03?

  1. Built-in GPSNo · W03: Yes
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · W03: Yes
  3. NFC paymentsNo · W03: Yes
  4. LTE (cellular)No · W03: Yes
  5. eSIMNo · W03: Yes
  6. SpeakerNo · W03: Yes
  7. Resolution (width)240 px vs 450 px+88%
  8. Pixel density200 ppi vs 321 ppi+60%
  9. Battery capacity260 mAh vs 361 mAh+39%
  10. Thickness12 mm vs 11 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare