NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. X1 vs BT101

Cubot X1 vs Oukitel BT101

What X1 does better (6) and where BT101 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Cubot X1
Cubot · 2024X1
5.4Score
6 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Oukitel BT101
Oukitel · 2024BT101
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ $55
8.8Display4.2
5.0Health tracking5.0
2.1Sports & outdoor2.1
3.9Smart features3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

X1BT101
44.5 × 52.714.246.1 × 58.313.3
X1BT101Difference
Height52.7 mm58.3 mm−5.6 mm
Width44.5 mm46.1 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness14.2 mm13.3 mm+0.9 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X1 better than BT101?

  1. Water resistance2 ATM vs 1 ATM2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · BT101: No
  3. Battery capacity850 mAh vs 410 mAh2.1×
  4. Screen size2.13″ vs 2.02″+5%
  5. Resolution (width)410 px vs 320 px+28%
  6. Pixel density304 ppi vs 250 ppi+22%

Why is BT101 better than X1?

  1. Thickness14.2 mm vs 13.3 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare