NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. X5 vs GTS 4

Cubot X5 vs Zeblaze GTS 4

What X5 does better (2) and where GTS 4 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cubot X5
Cubot · 2026X5
4.9Score
2 advantages
vs
Zeblaze GTS 4
Zeblaze · 2026GTS 4
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
8.8Display9.7
5.0Health tracking5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

X5GTS 4
45.4 × 53.914.447 × 478.7
X5GTS 4Difference
Case size45.4 mm47 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness14.4 mm8.7 mm+5.7 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X5 better than GTS 4?

  1. Battery capacity900 mAh vs 260 mAh3.5×
  2. Screen size2.13″ vs 1.94″+10%

Why is GTS 4 better than X5?

  1. Thickness14.4 mm vs 8.7 mm+66%
  2. Resolution (width)410 px vs 466 px+14%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare