Why is BFH-19 better than Charge 5?
BFH-19 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Charge 5 better than BFH-19?
- Weight66 g vs 51 g+29%
- Screen size0.96″ vs 1″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 42 mm | — |
| Weight | 66 g | 51 g |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Gorillaglas |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 0.96″ | 1″ |
| Display technology | LCD | — |
| Panel | LCD | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | — |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 90 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 1 | — |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
