vs
2.4Display3.4
9.8Health tracking4.9
Why is SW-162 better than Smartwatch 1ES?
SW-162 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Smartwatch 1ES better than SW-162?
- Screen size1.4″ vs 1.7″+21%
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 220 mAh+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.4″ | 1.7″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | IPS | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 283 px |
| Pixel density | — | 218 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 220 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
