vs
Why is SW-164 better than Fit Watch 5000?
SW-164 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Fit Watch 5000 better than SW-164?
- Screen size1.4″ vs 1.65″+18%
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 300 mAh+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 38 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 35 g |
| Thickness | — | 10 mm |
| Height | — | 255 mm |
| Width | — | 37 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Stainless steel |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Kunststoff |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.4″ | 1.65″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | — | LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 7 days |
| Battery life (hours) | 168 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 1 | — |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
