Why is SW-164 better than Band Style?
- Screen size1.4″ vs 1.1″+27%
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 100 mAh+80%
Why is Band Style better than SW-164?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 12 days+71%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 38 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Kautschuk |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.4″ | 1.1″ |
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 126 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 294 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 12 days |
| Battery life (hours) | 168 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | — | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 1 | — |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android |
| Chipset | — | Ambiq Apollo3 |









