Why is SW-182 better than Watch C3?
SW-182 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch C3 better than SW-182?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)5 days vs 10 days2×
- Resolution (width)128 px vs 240 px+88%
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.85″+9%
- Battery capacity200 mAh vs 350 mAh+75%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Thickness | — | 11.8 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Kunststoffglas |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Gummi, Nylon |
| Water resistance | — | 2 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 2 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.85″ |
| Panel | IPS | — |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 128 px | 280 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 5 days | 10 days |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Music on the watch | — | Yes |
| Storage | — | 4 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
