vs
2.0Display7.1
5.0Health tracking5.0
Why is SWC-342 better than CMF Watch Pro?
- Thickness11 mm vs 11.4 mm+4%
Why is CMF Watch Pro better than SWC-342?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · SWC-342: Yes
- Screen size1.2″ vs 1.96″+63%
- Battery capacity180 mAh vs 340 mAh+89%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 410 px+71%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 47 mm |
| Weight | — | 31.1 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 11.4 mm |
| Height | — | 46.9 mm |
| Width | — | 39.9 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | — |
| Colours | — | Dark Gray, Ash Gray, Metallic Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.2″ | 1.96″ |
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 410 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 502 px |
| Pixel density | — | 331 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 180 mAh | 340 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 3 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | Android | — |
| Chipset | Realtek 8763C | — |
