Dimensions
Size comparison
CR1 ProWatch GT
| CR1 Pro | Watch GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 45 mm | 47.8 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 45 mm | 46.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 11.5 mm | 12.4 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 47 g | 30 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CR1 Pro better than Watch GT?
- Thickness11.5 mm vs 12.4 mm+8%
Why is Watch GT better than CR1 Pro?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · CR1 Pro: Yes
- Weight47 g vs 30 g+57%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 454 px+89%
- Screen size1.28″ vs 1.39″+9%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 420 mAh+40%
- Pixel density265 ppi vs 326 ppi+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 45 mm | 48 mm |
| Weight | 47 g | 30 g |
| Thickness | 11.5 mm | 12.4 mm |
| Height | 45 mm | 47.8 mm |
| Width | 45 mm | 46.4 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Aluminium |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Grey Black | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.28″ | 1.39″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 454 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 454 px |
| Pixel density | 265 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 420 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Chipset | nRF52840 | — |
