Dimensions
Size comparison
CS2Watch 3
| CS2 | Watch 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43.8 mm | 45 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 36.9 mm | 37 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 11.5 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 40 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CS2 better than Watch 3?
- Weight35 g vs 40 g+14%
- Thickness10.5 mm vs 11.5 mm+10%
Why is Watch 3 better than CS2?
- SpeakerNo · CS2: Yes
- Screen size1.69″ vs 1.8″+7%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 340 mAh+13%
- Pixel density201 ppi vs 207 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | 45 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 40 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 11.5 mm |
| Height | 43.8 mm | 45 mm |
| Width | 36.9 mm | 37 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, Rose Gold, Silver | Black, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.69″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 286 px |
| Pixel density | 201 ppi | 207 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 340 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Chipset | Realtek 8762C | — |
