Dimensions
Size comparison
CS2Watch GPS
| CS2 | Watch GPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43.8 mm | 42 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Width | 36.9 mm | 37 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 12 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 35 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is CS2 better than Watch GPS?
- Screen size1.69″ vs 1.3″+30%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 210 mAh+43%
- Thickness10.5 mm vs 12 mm+14%
Why is Watch GPS better than CS2?
- Built-in GPSNo · CS2: Yes
- Pixel density201 ppi vs 261 ppi+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 44 mm | 42 mm |
| Weight | 35 g | 35 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 12 mm |
| Height | 43.8 mm | 42 mm |
| Width | 36.9 mm | 37 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Plastic / polymer |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Rose Gold, Silver | Black/Green, Black/Red, Pink/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.69″ | 1.3″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Pixel density | 201 ppi | 261 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietary | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Chipset | Realtek 8762C | — |
