vs
2.9Build & durability6.0
Why is Charge 5 better than Vivofit jr. 3 Marvel?
- Screen size1″ vs 0.79″+27%
Why is Vivofit jr. 3 Marvel better than Charge 5?
- Weight51 g vs 25 g2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 51 g | 25 g |
| Case material | Aluminium | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorillaglas | — |
| Strap material | — | silicone |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m | 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1″ | 0.79″ |
| Display technology | — | Memory-in-pixel (transflective) |
| Panel | — | Sunlight-visible, transflective 64 color memory-in-pixel |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | No |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 112 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 112 px |
| Pixel density | — | 142 ppi |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Lithium metal |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | 4 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Garmin OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
