Why is Charge 5 better than Watch Fit?
- NFC paymentsYes · Watch Fit: No
Why is Watch Fit better than Charge 5?
- Weight51 g vs 21 g2.4×
- Screen size1″ vs 1.64″+64%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | 51 g | 21 g |
| Thickness | — | 10.7 mm |
| Height | — | 46 mm |
| Width | — | 30 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorillaglas | — |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Black | Graphite Black, Sakura Pink, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1″ | 1.64″ |
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 280 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 456 px |
| Pixel density | — | 326 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Music on the watch | — | Yes |
| Storage | — | 4 GB |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
