Why is Charge 5 better than FW34?
Charge 5 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is FW34 better than Charge 5?
- Weight51 g vs 24 g2.1×
- Screen size1″ vs 1.08″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 51 g | 24 g |
| Thickness | — | 11 mm |
| Height | — | 43 mm |
| Width | — | 23 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorillaglas | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m | 1 m |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1″ | 1.08″ |
| Display technology | — | LCD |
| Panel | — | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 105 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 4 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
