Why is Charge 6 better than Fit FW42?
Charge 6 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Fit FW42 better than Charge 6?
- Battery capacity65 mAh vs 180 mAh2.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 51 g | — |
| Case material | Aluminium | Stainless steel |
| Lens / cover glass | Gorillaglas | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 50 m | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1″ | — |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | — | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | 7 days |
| Battery capacity | 65 mAh | 180 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| ECG | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, accelerometer | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
