NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. iGo Watch 4! JW-600 vs Watch 4000

Forever iGo Watch 4! JW-600 vs Hama Watch 4000

What iGo Watch 4! JW-600 does better (2) and where Watch 4000 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Forever iGo Watch 4! JW-600
Forever · 2025iGo Watch 4! JW-600
2 advantages≈ $40
vs
Hama Watch 4000
Hama · 2025Watch 4000
4.8Score
3 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
4.9Display3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

iGo Watch 4! JW-600Watch 4000
10.6 × 4625646 × 4611
iGo Watch 4! JW-600Watch 4000Difference
Case size10.6 mm46 mm−35.4 mm
Thickness256 mm11 mm+245 mm
Weight34 g39 g−5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iGo Watch 4! JW-600 better than Watch 4000?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Watch 4000: No
  2. Weight33.9 g vs 39 g+15%

Why is Watch 4000 better than iGo Watch 4! JW-600?

  1. Thickness256 mm vs 11 mm23.3×
  2. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.65″+29%
  3. Battery capacity280 mAh vs 300 mAh+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare