NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach J1 vs Run 2

Garmin Approach J1 vs Suunto Run 2

What Approach J1 does better (2) and where Run 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach J1
Garmin · 2026Approach J1
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ $300
vs
Suunto Run 2
Suunto · 2026Run 2
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
6.3Display7.1
2.7Battery life4.6
2.5Sports & outdoor4.5
3.9Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach J1Run 2
43 × 4311.446.5 × 46.511.7
Approach J1Run 2Difference
Height43 mm46.5 mm−3.5 mm
Width43 mm46.5 mm−3.5 mm
Thickness11.4 mm11.7 mm−0.3 mm
Weight29 g53 g−24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach J1 better than Run 2?

  1. Weight29 g vs 53 g+83%
  2. Thickness11.4 mm vs 11.7 mm+3%

Why is Run 2 better than Approach J1?

  1. GPS battery life15 h vs 30 h2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 12 days+20%
  3. Sport profiles5 vs 326.4×
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare