NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S42 vs Forerunner 255S

Garmin Approach S42 vs Garmin Forerunner 255S

What Approach S42 does better (3) and where Forerunner 255S wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S42
Garmin · 2021Approach S42
3.6Score
3 advantages≈ $300
vs
Garmin Forerunner 255S
Garmin · 2022Forerunner 255S
3.9Score
5 advantages≈ $350
Higher score
3.4Display2.2
2.7Battery life3.7
2.9Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S42Forerunner 255S
43.4 × 43.411.741 × 4112.4
Approach S42Forerunner 255SDifference
Height43.4 mm41 mm+2.4 mm
Width43.4 mm41 mm+2.4 mm
Thickness11.7 mm12.4 mm−0.7 mm
Weight43 g39 g+4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S42 better than Forerunner 255S?

  1. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.1″+9%
  2. Resolution (width)240 px vs 218 px+10%
  3. Thickness11.7 mm vs 12.4 mm+6%

Why is Forerunner 255S better than Approach S42?

  1. GPS battery life15 h vs 26 h+73%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 12 days+20%
  3. Sport profiles5 vs 5811.6×
  4. Storage0.06 GB vs 4 GB66.7×
  5. Weight43 g vs 39 g+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare