NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S42 vs Pacer Pro

Garmin Approach S42 vs Polar Pacer Pro

What Approach S42 does better (2) and where Pacer Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S42
Garmin · 2021Approach S42
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $300
vs
Polar Pacer Pro
Polar · 2022Pacer Pro
3.7Score
2 advantages≈ $380
Higher score
3.4Display2.3
2.7Battery life3.2
2.9Build & durability4.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S42Pacer Pro
43.4 × 43.411.745 × 4511.5
Approach S42Pacer ProDifference
Height43.4 mm45 mm−1.6 mm
Width43.4 mm45 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness11.7 mm11.5 mm+0.2 mm
Weight43 g41 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S42 better than Pacer Pro?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 6.5 days+54%
  2. TouchscreenYes · Pacer Pro: No

Why is Pacer Pro better than Approach S42?

  1. GPS battery life15 h vs 30 h2×
  2. Weight43 g vs 41 g+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare