NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S50 vs Approach S72 47mm

Garmin Approach S50 vs Garmin Approach S72 47mm

What Approach S50 does better (2) and where Approach S72 47mm wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S50
Garmin · 2025Approach S50
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $400
vs
Garmin Approach S72 47mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 47mm
6.5Score
6 advantages≈ $800
Higher score
5.3Display6.5
4.9Health tracking8.3
3.2Sports & outdoor6.7
6.5Smart features3.2
3.9Build & durability5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S50Approach S72 47mm
43 × 4311.447 × 4713.5
Approach S50Approach S72 47mmDifference
Height43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Width43 mm47 mm−4 mm
Thickness11.4 mm13.5 mm−2.1 mm
Weight29 g48 g−19 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S50 better than Approach S72 47mm?

  1. Weight29 g vs 48 g+66%
  2. Thickness11.4 mm vs 13.5 mm+18%

Why is Approach S72 47mm better than Approach S50?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 16 days+60%
  2. Storage4 GB vs 64 GB16×
  3. Sport profiles46 vs 952.1×
  4. Sapphire crystalNo · Approach S50: Yes
  5. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.4″+17%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 454 px+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare