NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Approach S72 43mm vs Descent G2

Garmin Approach S72 43mm vs Garmin Descent G2

What Approach S72 43mm does better (6) and where Descent G2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Approach S72 43mm
Garmin · 2026Approach S72 43mm
6.3Score
6 advantages≈ $800
Higher score
vs
Garmin Descent G2
Garmin · 2025Descent G2
5.7Score
1 advantage≈ $700
5.0Display6.0
8.3Health tracking4.9
6.7Sports & outdoor5.4
5.3Build & durability9.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Approach S72 43mmDescent G2
43 × 4312.945.5 × 45.515.2
Approach S72 43mmDescent G2Difference
Height43 mm45.5 mm−2.5 mm
Width43 mm45.5 mm−2.5 mm
Thickness12.9 mm15.2 mm−2.3 mm
Weight41 g65 g−24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Approach S72 43mm better than Descent G2?

  1. Weight41 g vs 65 g+59%
  2. Storage64 GB vs 4 GB16×
  3. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  4. Thickness12.9 mm vs 15.2 mm+18%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 390 px+7%
  6. Sport profiles95 vs 93+2%

Why is Descent G2 better than Approach S72 43mm?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare