NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. D2 Mach 1 vs Descent Mk3 43mm

Garmin D2 Mach 1 vs Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm

What D2 Mach 1 does better (6) and where Descent Mk3 43mm wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin D2 Mach 1
Garmin · 2022D2 Mach 1
6.3Score
6 advantages≈ $1,300
vs
Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3 43mm
6.8Score
4 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
5.0Display6.0
4.9Battery life3.4
4.9Health tracking9.4
5.1Sports & outdoor6.9
6.5Smart features6.5
8.8Build & durability9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

D2 Mach 1Descent Mk3 43mm
47 × 4714.543 × 4314.2
D2 Mach 1Descent Mk3 43mmDifference
Height47 mm43 mm+4 mm
Width47 mm43 mm+4 mm
Thickness14.5 mm14.2 mm+0.3 mm
Weight70 g54 g+16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is D2 Mach 1 better than Descent Mk3 43mm?

  1. GPS battery life42 h vs 28 h+50%
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)11 days vs 10 days+10%
  3. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  4. Battery saver mode21 days vs 12 days+75%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)20 h vs 17 h+18%
  6. Resolution (width)416 px vs 390 px+7%

Why is Descent Mk3 43mm better than D2 Mach 1?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 20 ATM2×
  2. Sport profiles41 vs 982.4×
  3. Weight70 g vs 53.5 g+31%
  4. Thickness14.5 mm vs 14.2 mm+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare