NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. D2 Mach 2 47mm vs Descent Mk3i 43mm

Garmin D2 Mach 2 47mm vs Garmin Descent Mk3i 43mm

What D2 Mach 2 47mm does better (9) and where Descent Mk3i 43mm wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Garmin D2 Mach 2 47mm
Garmin · 2025D2 Mach 2 47mm
7.8Score
9 advantages≈ $1,350
Higher score
vs
Garmin Descent Mk3i 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3i 43mm
6.8Score
3 advantages≈ $1,400
7.5Display6.0
6.6Battery life3.4
8.3Health tracking9.4
9.2Sports & outdoor6.9
3.2Smart features6.5
7.7Build & durability9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

D2 Mach 2 47mmDescent Mk3i 43mm
47 × 4713.843 × 4314.3
D2 Mach 2 47mmDescent Mk3i 43mmDifference
Height47 mm43 mm+4 mm
Width47 mm43 mm+4 mm
Thickness13.8 mm14.3 mm−0.5 mm
Weight73 g49 g+24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is D2 Mach 2 47mm better than Descent Mk3i 43mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 10 days+40%
  2. GPS battery life47 h vs 28 h+68%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)35 h vs 17 h2.1×
  4. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.2″+17%
  5. Battery saver mode23 days vs 12 days+92%
  6. Battery life with always-on display7 days vs 4 days+75%
  7. Resolution (width)454 px vs 390 px+16%
  8. Thickness13.8 mm vs 14.3 mm+4%
  9. Sport profiles100 vs 98+2%

Why is Descent Mk3i 43mm better than D2 Mach 2 47mm?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 20 ATM2×
  2. Weight73 g vs 49.3 g+48%
  3. Rated dive depth40 m vs 200 m5×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare