NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent G1 vs Descent Mk2S

Garmin Descent G1 vs Garmin Descent Mk2S

What Descent G1 does better (5) and where Descent Mk2S wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent G1
Garmin · 2022Descent G1
5.7Score
5 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
vs
Garmin Descent Mk2S
Garmin · 2021Descent Mk2S
4.5Score
4 advantages≈ $1,000
2.6Display2.9
6.6Battery life2.2
4.9Health tracking4.9
4.0Sports & outdoor4.8
9.5Build & durability9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent G1Descent Mk2S
45.5 × 45.515.243 × 4314.2
Descent G1Descent Mk2SDifference
Height45.5 mm43 mm+2.5 mm
Width45.5 mm43 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness15.2 mm14.2 mm+1 mm
Weight61 g60 g+1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent G1 better than Descent Mk2S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)21 days vs 7 days3×
  2. GPS battery life26 h vs 18 h+44%
  3. Battery saver mode48 days vs 21 days2.3×
  4. Screen size1.27″ vs 1.2″+6%
  5. Sport profiles46 vs 44+5%

Why is Descent Mk2S better than Descent G1?

  1. Storage0.03 GB vs 32 GB1,066.7×
  2. Pixel density139 ppi vs 200 ppi+44%
  3. Resolution (width)176 px vs 240 px+36%
  4. Thickness15.2 mm vs 14.2 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare