NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent G2 vs Descent Mk3 43mm

Garmin Descent G2 vs Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm

What Descent G2 does better (0) and where Descent Mk3 43mm wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent G2
Garmin · 2025Descent G2
5.7Score
0 advantages≈ $700
vs
Garmin Descent Mk3 43mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3 43mm
6.8Score
7 advantages≈ $1,200
Higher score
6.0Display6.0
2.9Battery life3.4
4.9Health tracking9.4
5.4Sports & outdoor6.9
9.4Build & durability9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent G2Descent Mk3 43mm
45.5 × 45.515.243 × 4314.2
Descent G2Descent Mk3 43mmDifference
Height45.5 mm43 mm+2.5 mm
Width45.5 mm43 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness15.2 mm14.2 mm+1 mm
Weight65 g54 g+12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent G2 better than Descent Mk3 43mm?

Descent G2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Descent Mk3 43mm better than Descent G2?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 20 ATM2×
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 28 h+40%
  3. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  4. Weight65 g vs 53.5 g+21%
  5. Rated dive depth100 m vs 200 m2×
  6. Thickness15.2 mm vs 14.2 mm+7%
  7. Sport profiles93 vs 98+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare