NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent G2 vs Race 2

Garmin Descent G2 vs Suunto Race 2

What Descent G2 does better (2) and where Race 2 wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent G2
Garmin · 2025Descent G2
5.7Score
2 advantages≈ $700
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
7 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
6.0Display6.3
2.9Battery life8.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.4Sports & outdoor6.4
9.4Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent G2Race 2
45.5 × 45.515.249 × 4912.5
Descent G2Race 2Difference
Height45.5 mm49 mm−3.5 mm
Width45.5 mm49 mm−3.5 mm
Thickness15.2 mm12.5 mm+2.7 mm
Weight65 g76 g−11 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent G2 better than Race 2?

  1. Weight65 g vs 76 g+17%
  2. Pixel density325 ppi vs 311 ppi+5%

Why is Race 2 better than Descent G2?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 65 h3.2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)10 days vs 18 days+80%
  3. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.5″+25%
  5. Thickness15.2 mm vs 12.5 mm+22%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  7. Sport profiles93 vs 95+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare