NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Descent Mk2 vs Quatix 6 Titanium

Garmin Descent Mk2 vs Garmin Quatix 6 Titanium

What Descent Mk2 does better (6) and where Quatix 6 Titanium wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Descent Mk2
Garmin · 2020Descent Mk2
6.3Score
6 advantages≈ $1,300
Higher score
vs
Garmin Quatix 6 Titanium
Garmin · 2020Quatix 6 Titanium
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ $1,000
7.2Battery life5.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
4.8Sports & outdoor3.4
6.5Smart features6.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Descent Mk2Quatix 6 Titanium
52 × 5217.847 × 4714.7
Descent Mk2Quatix 6 TitaniumDifference
Height52 mm47 mm+5 mm
Width52 mm47 mm+5 mm
Thickness17.8 mm14.7 mm+3.1 mm
Weight104 g72 g+32 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Descent Mk2 better than Quatix 6 Titanium?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)16 days vs 14 days+14%
  2. GPS battery life48 h vs 36 h+33%
  3. Screen size1.4″ vs 1.3″+8%
  4. Sport profiles44 vs 29+52%
  5. Resolution (width)280 px vs 260 px+8%
  6. Battery saver mode50 days vs 48 days+4%

Why is Quatix 6 Titanium better than Descent Mk2?

  1. Weight103.8 g vs 72 g+44%
  2. Thickness17.8 mm vs 14.7 mm+21%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare